Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus

I was originally introduced to him a few years back for a project and since then have been fascinated by this man.

"Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus (519 BC – 430 BC) was a Roman aristocrat and statesman whose service as consul in 460 BC and dictator in 458 BC and 439 BC made him a model of civic virtue.[1]
Cincinnatus was regarded by the Romans, especially the aristocratic patrician class, as one of the heroes of early Rome and as a model of Roman virtue and simplicity.[2] He was a persistent opponent of the plebeians.[2] When his son, Caeso Quinctius, was convicted and condemned to death, Cincinnatus was forced to live in humble circumstances, working on his own small farm, until an invasion caused him to be called to serve Rome as dictator, an office which he immediately resigned after completing his task of defeating the rivaling tribes of the Aequians, Sabines, and Volscians."
~Wikipedia

I've always wondered how Rome may of been changed had instead of resigning he had kept his post, as he was clearly a powerful and clear-minded ruler. I'm curious as to anyone's opinion of this or general prediction should he have remained in power?

No, that would have been bad. History has already showed us what dictator did to Rome. Caesar was good at first too but perpetually during his reign he lost his touch. After his assassination and the civil war from 44 to 31 BCE Rome had it's first taste as a true dictatorship. Without the proper control of the senate and republican process they all became completely mad. After Nero and Caligula, Rome was so fucked that not even great rulers such as Diocletian and Constantine could fix it. Creating the dictatorship earlier might have lead to the avoidance of the Ides of March and perhaps a lack of Julius's military conquests. Changing history so greatly could have greatly affected the present.