Official Debate #2: Prison Freedom

This subject can be argued many different ways, It can be argued that if the prison rules were expanded into our society, does that mean we deserve the same boundaries as someone who killed, or raped, or sexually assaulted someone? Is it fair to limit all people, innocent or not? I believe that with these boundaries expanding into society that not only would this be a complete mess for the simple reason of people rebelling because of such an act. I believe this would cause complete chaos, that being said I still think that maybe if this were to happen, it could put a large cap on the crime rate. This also leaves the issue of when somebody does commit a crime what is to happen, if we are all already living by set prison freedoms than what is to happen? Are they let off, or killed? People who are in prison for the most part don't deserve the freedoms they were giving, not in all cases where someone is wrongly accused, or forced to commit a crime in fear, or need. With 'prison freedoms' being expanded into society, this pretty much takes a piss on all the freedoms brave people have faught to give us. I don't believe in war, but I do believe in intentions, and reasoning, and the reason these soldiers went to war is for these freedoms that we have today, and to take those away by giving us the same freedom as someone who didn't care enough to respect the freedom they had is completely arbitrary. At the same time there are people all over starving, all over killing for a warm place to sleep and with set freedoms I believe the crime rate would dramatically decrease in some of the poorer areas of the world. I am against this taking freedoms from people who have it, yet for it helping people who don't even have the luxury a convicted felon has.