Political System Debate

So, I have decided to post a new thread here.
This one is quite the fun.

It is our political system debate!

Which systems do you think show a lot of benefit, or promise?
Which do you think are quite trashy, or disgusting?

I think that the political system is not responsible for backwardness in the country but the politician is responsible for the backwardness. Because there is lack of good leader in our country that's why for example India is facing backwardness in poverty, electricity, education, water.

People must understand their responsibility to elect good leaders. Many people still cast their votes based on culture, caste, religion, region. This hamper the growth of a nation.

The politicians have power so they have to do their work with honesty, patriotic way, not thinking to make money. So politicians have change the nation.

I believe Anarchism (socialist anarchism, not that silly anarcho-capitalist nonsense) is the ideal political system but it's so radical that I don't think it'll be implemented on a large scale within my lifetime.

As you can probably tell, all forms of capitalism are disgusting to me, specifically state capitalism (like the US and Europe has), and the imaginary anarcho-capitalism.

I follow the ideas that generally fall into libertarian socialism (social anarchy, left-libertarianism, whatever you want to call it). This is a philosophical belief, it will never happen and I understand that it will never happen, but it doesn't mean you can argue for an idea.

I personally don't see any form of government to be "disgusting", each have there positives and negatives associated with them, some are more friendly to personal freedom while others are more friendly toward equality.

---

I believe Anarchism (socialist anarchism, not that silly anarcho-capitalist nonsense) is the ideal political system but it's so radical that I don't think it'll be implemented on a large scale within my lifetime.

As you can probably tell, all forms of capitalism are disgusting to me, specifically state capitalism (like the US and Europe has), and the imaginary anarcho-capitalism.

For what reasons do you consider anarcho-capitalism to be imaginary, it is a political model just as all others, perhaps with some inconsistencies but it does have a somewhat stable base of natural human desires.

For me, capitalism requires a state to enforce private property rights. Otherwise it's just people saying "I own this arbitrary plot of land and if you enter without my permission I have the right to use force against you", or the creation of private police and courts which are obviously going to be used by the capitalists to maintain their own power.