




Homosexuals are worthless biologically speaking
Thead Owner : Guest,
Category : Lounge,
24 Comment,
382 Read
Viewers:
2 Guest(s)
03-12-2014, 12:47 PM
(03-12-2014, 12:31 PM)Freddy Krueger Wrote:(03-12-2014, 12:29 PM)Master Wrote: I don't fully agree with this. If reproduction was still necessary in this age, homosexuals are still capable of reproducing. They have the capability, but what they lack is the desire. Is someone who is straight, but never wants to have children also worthless biologically? They both lack the desire. What you need is someone who lacks the capability. Those would be those born sterile or some other inability to reproduce naturally. But regardless, we don't have to worry about carrying on the human race as individuals anymore, :).
It's not the desire, a lot of homosexual couples desire kids.
It's the fact that they biologically are unable to produce kids.
How are they biologically unable? If in your situation, the human race needed to be carried on, a homosexual is very capable of reproducing with a female.
They are only biologically unable with each other.
03-12-2014, 12:56 PM
I agree, they are biologically worthless as not only is a organism's main function to reproduce, ethically speaking (Natural Law) we must reproduce and homosexuals can not reach that as obviously they are not able to reproduce. I am not against gays at all I have many gay friends, just I agree with the basis of this post.
Delila, you are awesome to post that, stay strong!
Delila, you are awesome to post that, stay strong!
03-12-2014, 01:04 PM
(03-12-2014, 12:56 PM)ocelotcr Wrote: I agree, they are biologically worthless as not only is a organism's main function to reproduce, ethically speaking (Natural Law) we must reproduce and homosexuals can not reach that as obviously they are not able to reproduce. I am not against gays at all I have many gay friends, just I agree with the basis of this post.
Delila, you are awesome to post that, stay strong!
Homosexuals have that function, thus rendering them not worthless. If anything, a better argument would be claiming the elderly, the sterile, those unable to conceive as biologically worthless.
Guest
Unregistered
4 Years of Service
03-12-2014, 01:10 PM
(03-12-2014, 01:04 PM)Master Wrote:(03-12-2014, 12:56 PM)ocelotcr Wrote: I agree, they are biologically worthless as not only is a organism's main function to reproduce, ethically speaking (Natural Law) we must reproduce and homosexuals can not reach that as obviously they are not able to reproduce. I am not against gays at all I have many gay friends, just I agree with the basis of this post.
Delila, you are awesome to post that, stay strong!
Homosexuals have that function, thus rendering them not worthless. If anything, a better argument would be claiming the elderly, the sterile, those unable to conceive as biologically worthless.
I agree with you here and found it pretty annoying with people ignoring your posts :P
They are able to reproduce with a woman they just don't have a desire to do so.
03-12-2014, 01:13 PM
(03-12-2014, 01:10 PM)yugurt Wrote:(03-12-2014, 01:04 PM)Master Wrote: Homosexuals have that function, thus rendering them not worthless. If anything, a better argument would be claiming the elderly, the sterile, those unable to conceive as biologically worthless.
I agree with you here and found it pretty annoying with people ignoring your posts :P
They are able to reproduce with a woman they just don't have a desire to do so.
Yeh I see what you mean, but they wont therefore they are not worth anything in that sense.
Guest
Unregistered
4 Years of Service
03-12-2014, 01:41 PM
(03-12-2014, 01:13 PM)ocelotcr Wrote:(03-12-2014, 01:10 PM)yugurt Wrote: I agree with you here and found it pretty annoying with people ignoring your posts :P
They are able to reproduce with a woman they just don't have a desire to do so.
Yeh I see what you mean, but they wont therefore they are not worth anything in that sense.
Well there is no motivation in our era. The earth is overpopulated so we hardly need more people. If that changed drastically behavior might also change.
03-12-2014, 01:58 PM
I thought this might be an interesting read given the subject for debate.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...abies.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...abies.html
03-12-2014, 08:18 PM
Science has already done this.
In a lab perfect sharks were grown in a artifical womb.
You can take the genes from two man and two women to make a new baby.
http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/k...u98CF4t0Q6
In a lab perfect sharks were grown in a artifical womb.
You can take the genes from two man and two women to make a new baby.
http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/k...u98CF4t0Q6
03-12-2014, 08:22 PM
It's common sense, really. Personally I don't have anything against those who are gay, as I really could care less.
What you like is your own business, as long as it isn't children and the other person likes your back.
Either way it's not like 100% of the world will be gay at one point, so honestly who cares.
What you like is your own business, as long as it isn't children and the other person likes your back.
Either way it's not like 100% of the world will be gay at one point, so honestly who cares.
Guest
Unregistered
4 Years of Service
03-13-2014, 03:21 AM
Homosexuals are biologically worthless, simply because while they have the ABILITY to reproduce, they choose not to due to their disliking of women. This is not a bad thing though. There is plenty of straight/bisexual people that will reproduce with women they find attractive. The only way a homosexual would be biologically useful, is if he forced himself to look past the woman's appearance and focus on her personality, and the need to have a family of his own blood. But then again, that would make him a Pansexual (someone who doesn't care about the gender or appearance of a person, but only emotional aspects/personality)